<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment on WEEK 1 – Blurring the lines by Jeremy Knox</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/bhenderson/2015/01/20/comment-on-week-1-blurring-the-lines-by-jeremy-knox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/bhenderson/2015/01/20/comment-on-week-1-blurring-the-lines-by-jeremy-knox/</link>
	<description>Education and Digital Cultures January 2015</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 18:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhenderson</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/bhenderson/2015/01/20/comment-on-week-1-blurring-the-lines-by-jeremy-knox/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bhenderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/bhenderson/?p=48#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the feedback Jeremy, really useful and I will definatly take foreward the comments on the lifestream.  

By defining &#039;us&#039;, I guess I am referring to a natural human organism without any technological enhancements, however, with the advancements in bio-technics and acceptance of prosthetics within society, this term is now up for debate.   
Also, as humans and technology evolve together, the question around &#039;can we go back?&#039; is irrelevant as we will always keep evolving, rather than devolving creating new societies and cultures in the process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback Jeremy, really useful and I will definatly take foreward the comments on the lifestream.  </p>
<p>By defining &#8216;us&#8217;, I guess I am referring to a natural human organism without any technological enhancements, however, with the advancements in bio-technics and acceptance of prosthetics within society, this term is now up for debate.<br />
Also, as humans and technology evolve together, the question around &#8216;can we go back?&#8217; is irrelevant as we will always keep evolving, rather than devolving creating new societies and cultures in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
