<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MSc in Digital Education at the University of Edinburgh</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter analytics by PJ</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/blog/2015/02/05/twitter-analytics/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/?p=3301#comment-99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Folks, just some first impressions on Twitter Analytics. I did a &#039;test run&#039; of Tweet Archivist for my &#039;Scandinavian Film &amp; TV Culture&#039; MOOC with key word search on Danish Director Lars Van Trier which resulted in 104 pages of tweets for just one week time span! I think that demonstrated to me the Jeremy&#039;s guidance below that our &#039;micro&#039;-ethnography needs to be very narrowly focused. Cheers, PJ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, just some first impressions on Twitter Analytics. I did a &#8216;test run&#8217; of Tweet Archivist for my &#8216;Scandinavian Film &amp; TV Culture&#8217; MOOC with key word search on Danish Director Lars Van Trier which resulted in 104 pages of tweets for just one week time span! I think that demonstrated to me the Jeremy&#8217;s guidance below that our &#8216;micro&#8217;-ethnography needs to be very narrowly focused. Cheers, PJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 2: let the film festival continue! by Ed</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/blog/2015/01/18/week-2-let-the-film-festival-continue/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/?p=3241#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got it, thanks Jeremy! Showing development of ideas is a great point. Right now though, I think I&#039;m just at the bubbling stage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it, thanks Jeremy! Showing development of ideas is a great point. Right now though, I think I&#8217;m just at the bubbling stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 2: let the film festival continue! by Jeremy Knox</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/blog/2015/01/18/week-2-let-the-film-festival-continue/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Knox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/?p=3241#comment-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ed,

Thanks for raising this. I think editing is absolutely fine, if you are altering existing content within a post. An important aspect of the lifestream is regularity and variety, so if you have new and different ideas, I&#039;d say they are better as new posts or feed items. It is fine for posts to be partial, so I wouldn&#039;t worry too much about polishing or editing. I think it is good to show your development through the lifestream - you can&#039;t do that with a single edited post, but you can do it with a number of posts that build on an idea ;) Happy to discuss further]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>Thanks for raising this. I think editing is absolutely fine, if you are altering existing content within a post. An important aspect of the lifestream is regularity and variety, so if you have new and different ideas, I&#8217;d say they are better as new posts or feed items. It is fine for posts to be partial, so I wouldn&#8217;t worry too much about polishing or editing. I think it is good to show your development through the lifestream &#8211; you can&#8217;t do that with a single edited post, but you can do it with a number of posts that build on an idea 😉 Happy to discuss further</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 2: let the film festival continue! by Ed</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/blog/2015/01/18/week-2-let-the-film-festival-continue/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/?p=3241#comment-67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jeremy and Sian,

Could you clarify how we should approach blog updates and rewrites? Not just minor edits to correct spelling mistakes, but adding, deleting paragraphs, moving them around.  Is it okay to make substantial edits when its the same post topic? 

Thanks,
Ed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeremy and Sian,</p>
<p>Could you clarify how we should approach blog updates and rewrites? Not just minor edits to correct spelling mistakes, but adding, deleting paragraphs, moving them around.  Is it okay to make substantial edits when its the same post topic? </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to the first Togethertube tutorial by sbayne</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/blog/2015/01/13/welcome-to-the-first-togethertube-tutorial/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sbayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/?p=3232#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Martin - I&#039;m afraid Togethertube doesn&#039;t allow us to archive the discussion at the moment - I agree it&#039;s a bit of a shame, though there&#039;s something nice about that too... 

I&#039;m glad you enjoyed the session though - so did I - and look forward to the next one this coming friday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin &#8211; I&#8217;m afraid Togethertube doesn&#8217;t allow us to archive the discussion at the moment &#8211; I agree it&#8217;s a bit of a shame, though there&#8217;s something nice about that too&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed the session though &#8211; so did I &#8211; and look forward to the next one this coming friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to the first Togethertube tutorial by Martyn</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/blog/2015/01/13/welcome-to-the-first-togethertube-tutorial/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/?p=3232#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Siân or Jeremy, is there a way we can look at the chat from the session? Togethertube is a great tool, I really enjoyed watching!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Siân or Jeremy, is there a way we can look at the chat from the session? Togethertube is a great tool, I really enjoyed watching!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
