<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Me, attempting to understand transhumanism and posthumanism</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/jdarling/2015/01/14/attempting-to-understand-transhumanism-and-posthumanism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/jdarling/2015/01/14/attempting-to-understand-transhumanism-and-posthumanism/</link>
	<description>Just another Education and digital culture 2015 site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sian Bayne</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/jdarling/2015/01/14/attempting-to-understand-transhumanism-and-posthumanism/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sian Bayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/jdarling/?p=91#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jin - you&#039;re right up to a point. Transhumanism (&#039;transitional human&#039;) suggests that technological enhancement of the human is an evolutionary stage. In some of the literatures &#039;the posthuman&#039; is the later stage of this transformation.

However - importantly - there is another strand of posthumanism which is more based in a critique of the philosophy of humanism - &#039;critical posthumanism&#039;. This isn&#039;t anything to do with enhancement or transcendence of bodily limitation, but it&#039;s rather to do with suggesting that we need to move beyond humanist philosophy in considering what it means to be human in the world: we can&#039;t continue to see &#039;the human&#039; as an essential entity that anchors all meaning and action, but need to think about how &#039;the human&#039; is constituted by its interactions and dependencies on other non-human and material entities.

In my paper set for this week there is a bit more on this distinction, so keep up the reading and thinking! It&#039;s good to see some substantive blog posts here in the lifestream, alongside the instagrams and tweets - great : )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jin &#8211; you&#8217;re right up to a point. Transhumanism (&#8216;transitional human&#8217;) suggests that technological enhancement of the human is an evolutionary stage. In some of the literatures &#8216;the posthuman&#8217; is the later stage of this transformation.</p>
<p>However &#8211; importantly &#8211; there is another strand of posthumanism which is more based in a critique of the philosophy of humanism &#8211; &#8216;critical posthumanism&#8217;. This isn&#8217;t anything to do with enhancement or transcendence of bodily limitation, but it&#8217;s rather to do with suggesting that we need to move beyond humanist philosophy in considering what it means to be human in the world: we can&#8217;t continue to see &#8216;the human&#8217; as an essential entity that anchors all meaning and action, but need to think about how &#8216;the human&#8217; is constituted by its interactions and dependencies on other non-human and material entities.</p>
<p>In my paper set for this week there is a bit more on this distinction, so keep up the reading and thinking! It&#8217;s good to see some substantive blog posts here in the lifestream, alongside the instagrams and tweets &#8211; great : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
