<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking more about Ethnography</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/02/13/thinking-about-ethnography-over-on-research-methods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/02/13/thinking-about-ethnography-over-on-research-methods/</link>
	<description>Another Education and digital culture 2015 site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbayne</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/02/13/thinking-about-ethnography-over-on-research-methods/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sbayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/?p=248#comment-169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Katherine - I understand this position and I think it reflects much of the debate about what &#039;counts&#039; as ethnography that has gone on in the social sciences in recent years. The kind of &#039;pure&#039; anthropological approach you outline here has been challenged quite a bit in methodological debates - partly, though not entirely, prompted by the rise of &#039;virtual&#039; and internet ethnography. I&#039;d really recommend the transcript of a talk by Martin Hammersley, which beautifully summarises some of the key points of contestation around the term, and asks the question of whether you can even have a &#039;virtual ethnography&#039;. He deals really intelligently with some of the issues you have raised:

http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/28/1/20.01.05EthnographySeminar-EthnographyProblemsandProspects.doc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katherine &#8211; I understand this position and I think it reflects much of the debate about what &#8216;counts&#8217; as ethnography that has gone on in the social sciences in recent years. The kind of &#8216;pure&#8217; anthropological approach you outline here has been challenged quite a bit in methodological debates &#8211; partly, though not entirely, prompted by the rise of &#8216;virtual&#8217; and internet ethnography. I&#8217;d really recommend the transcript of a talk by Martin Hammersley, which beautifully summarises some of the key points of contestation around the term, and asks the question of whether you can even have a &#8216;virtual ethnography&#8217;. He deals really intelligently with some of the issues you have raised:</p>
<p><a href="http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/28/1/20.01.05EthnographySeminar-EthnographyProblemsandProspects.doc" rel="nofollow">http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/28/1/20.01.05EthnographySeminar-EthnographyProblemsandProspects.doc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
