<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Katherine&#039;s EDC blog &#187; history</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/tag/history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth</link>
	<description>Another Education and digital culture 2015 site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 05:44:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Three Things I read on Twitter this week</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/01/31/three-things-i-read-on-twitter-this-week/</link>
		<comments>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/01/31/three-things-i-read-on-twitter-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 04:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katherine]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic prose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Defense of Academic Writing, by Judgemental Observer, via @FreshlyPressed. &#8220;the internet has created the scholarship of the pastless present&#8221; http://t.co/EIm8V0nZSB in defense of academic writing, via @cherilucas — nathanjurgenson (@nathanjurgenson) January 28, 2015 But the internet has created the scholarship of the pastless present, where a subject’s history can be summed up in the last [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://judgmentalobserver.com/2015/01/08/in-defense-of-academic-writing/">In Defense of Academic Writing</a>, by Judgemental Observer, via @FreshlyPressed.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>&#8220;the internet has created the scholarship of the pastless present&#8221; <a href="http://t.co/EIm8V0nZSB">http://t.co/EIm8V0nZSB</a> in defense of academic writing, via <a href="https://twitter.com/cherilucas">@cherilucas</a></p>
<p>— nathanjurgenson (@nathanjurgenson) <a href="https://twitter.com/nathanjurgenson/status/560497218298576898">January 28, 2015</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>But the internet has created the scholarship of the pastless present, where a subject’s history can be summed up in the last thinkpiece that was published about it, which was last week. And last week is, of course, ancient history. Quick and dirty analyses of entire decades, entire industries, entire races and genders, are generally easy and even enjoyable to read (simplicity is bliss!), and they often contain (some) good information. But many of them make claims they can’t support. They write checks their asses can’t cash. But you know who CAN cash those checks? Academics. In fact, those are <a href="http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16293/why-is-college-tuition-high-but-academic-salaries-low">some of the only checks</a> we <em>ever </em>get to cash.</p></blockquote>
<p>****</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n06/anne-enright/diary">Diary</a>, by Anne Enright in the LRB on censorship in Ireland.</p>
<blockquote><p>Really enjoyed this Anne Enright piece on censorship in Ireland, can&#8217;t believe how little I knew of it <a href="http://t.co/OLlc9U8Mc5">http://t.co/OLlc9U8Mc5</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/LRB">@LRB</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>— canalcook (@canalcook) <a href="https://twitter.com/canalcook/status/560567953452990464">January 28, 2015</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The result of censorship was not so much ignorance as intellectual bad faith. In an atmosphere of uncertainty and doublespeak, McGahern found ‘it was safe to attack a book as rubbish but quite dangerous to say you actually liked a book and admired it. You often found that people were attacking people like Lawrence, and they hadn’t read him at all.’ There was the available sense that troublesome writers were probably no good.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>The complicity of police, customs officials, literary critics, the church, the law, and local governments in censoring literary fiction, non-fiction and memoir, complemented in interesting ways the points made by Katharine N Hayles in her <a href="http://www.sagepub.com/rose/Docs/Hayles.pdf">article</a>, shared by Sian.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>&#8216;The cyborg is no longer the most compelling metaphor&#8217; &#8211; <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/mscedc?src=hash">#mscedc</a> may find Hayles&#8217; 2006 paper interesting this week: <a href="http://t.co/9ShbLAaYPF">http://t.co/9ShbLAaYPF</a></p>
<p>— Sian Bayne (@sbayne) <a href="https://twitter.com/sbayne/status/559701494396903425">January 26, 2015</a></p></blockquote>
<div class="page" title="Page 5">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<blockquote><p>Alane Kochems, a national security analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said, ‘I don’t think your privacy is violated when you have a computer doing it as opposed to a human. It isn’t a sentient being. It’s a machine running a program’ (Savage, 2005). But this reasoning is surely specious, since in the first place it was humans who designed the machine. Moreover, if the material is on file, it is always available for human scrutiny. Human and machine cognitions have now become so inter-twined that distinguishing between the two in the context of surveillance makes no sense.</p></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/01/31/three-things-i-read-on-twitter-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visual Artifact</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/01/29/visual-artifact/</link>
		<comments>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/01/29/visual-artifact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katherine]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual artifact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve found drawing out my ideas can help me make connections. I used Paper by 53 throughout IDEL to make visual artifacts (as well as video, still life photography etc), and wanted to keep up the practice. Here&#8217;s a visual artifact about the history of writing I drew. I then shared it on 53&#8217;s social sharing [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found drawing out my ideas can help me make connections. I used Paper by 53 throughout IDEL to make visual artifacts (as well as video, still life photography etc), and wanted to keep up the practice. Here&#8217;s a visual artifact about the history of writing I drew.</p>
<p>I then <a href="https://mix.fiftythree.com/1867810-Katrina-Fee">shared it on 53&#8217;s social sharing site, Mix.</a></p>
<div id="attachment_175" style="width: 1034px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2015/01/Visual-artifact.jpg"><img class="wp-image-175 size-full" src="http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2015/01/Visual-artifact.jpg" alt="A history of writing, by Katherine Firth" width="1024" height="768" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A history of writing, by Katherine Firth</p></div>
<p>The history is not chronological, but concurrent. History is always now for those who read it.</p>
<p>The quartered page suggests a map or survey (as we have <a title="Comment on Live-blogging the Readings: Miller (2011) by Sian Bayne" href="http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/01/18/comment-on-live-blogging-the-readings-miller-2011-by-sian-bayne/">previously discussed</a>). It might be a cartoon, with a narrative. Of the pages of a chapbook, before they are folded. Or it might be a collection, a cabinet of curiosities (like <a href="http://jenrossity.net/artefact/cabinet.htm">Jen&#8217;s visual artifact from 2009</a>). Or it might be a storyboard, the preparation for a video (to become somehthing like <a href="http://edc.education.ed.ac.uk/jamesl/2010/10/11/taking-poetic-license-with-the-creation-of-my-digital-artefact/">James&#8217; artifact from 2010</a>). Or it might be a digital-vintage-nostlagic pinboard (like <a href="http://www.glogster.com/taddlepoosh/human-inhuman-posthuman-/g-6m1ghglq5a53bs8rkpuq6a0?old_view=True">Carol&#8217;s artifact from 2011</a>).</p>
<p>I enjoyed remixing photographs, clay carvings, and etchings into drawings and &#8216;watercolours&#8217; using a digital medium. I couldn&#8217;t find my stylus, so I drew and wrote with my finger: very low/high tech!</p>
<p>***</p>
<p><em>Sources for the images:</em></p>
<p><a href="http://library.sc.edu/spcoll/britlit/cbooks/cbook1.html">What is a Chapbook?</a> University of South Carolina Library</p>
<p><a href="http://www.archimagazine.com/rzibagnorini.htm">Lo Zibaldone di Telemaco Signorini</a>. Archimagazine.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aldokkan.com/society/scribe.htm">Mesopotamian Scribe.</a> Aidokkan.</p>
<p><a href="http://campsite-studio.com/2013/11/pencil-stylus-by-53/">Pencil Stylus by 53</a>. Campsite.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/01/29/visual-artifact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
