<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Katherine&#039;s EDC blog &#187; readership</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/tag/readership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth</link>
	<description>Another Education and digital culture 2015 site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 05:44:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Week 3 Reflection</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/02/01/week-3-reflection/</link>
		<comments>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/02/01/week-3-reflection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 00:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katherine]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Reflections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the blog turned a corner. It ceased to be quite so much about automatic, machine-led, machine readable content, and became more curated. The human reader was brought slightly further back into the picture. In many ways, the blog had become too post-human. It collected things automatically, in ways that made sense to the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the blog turned a corner. It ceased to be quite so much about automatic, machine-led, machine readable content, and became more curated. The human reader was brought slightly further back into the picture.</p>
<p><strong>In many ways, the blog had become too post-human.</strong> It collected things automatically, in ways that made sense to the machine.</p>
<p>Since the beginning of this semester, I&#8217;ve struggled with that. It was ugly. It was hard to read. It was unfriendly to the audience I was trying to reach&#8211;primarily the rest of the MScECD cohort, who are humans&#8230; and me.</p>
<p>The machine reading was glitchy too. The tags didn&#8217;t work, there were no analytics. I had no idea if the bots are crawling over my text and finding useful metadata to feed into search engines and algorithms.</p>
<p><strong>And there there are my very human glitches.</strong> I wear glasses, partly because I&#8217;m short sighted, partly because I have strong astigmatism. I&#8217;m also slightly dyslexic. And I get travel sick very easily. I usually have great coping strategies, but I can&#8217;t bear it when things flicker or move. Or when it&#8217;s hard to scan the text, and the text starts to move on its own (or rather it moves somewhere between my retina and my brain). That makes me feel ill.</p>
<p><strong>So we have a truly embodied reading experience.</strong> A human reading experience. A flawed reading experience at the centre of this.</p>
<p>And so this week I moved to curation, to clickbait headlines, to careful selection of a broad stream of sources. I think that will help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/kfirth/2015/02/01/week-3-reflection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
