<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Haraway&#8217;s Cyborg Manifesto</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/2015/01/22/haraways-cyborg-manifesto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/2015/01/22/haraways-cyborg-manifesto/</link>
	<description>&#34;If you could see what I have seen with your eyes ...&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:20:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbayne</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/2015/01/22/haraways-cyborg-manifesto/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sbayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/?p=100#comment-15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick, I also found this a really well-done summary of the manifesto, and Katherine&#039;s examples from the film festival give it extra force. One of the readings we have looked at in previous years, though not this one so far, is Katherine Hayles&#039; response to Haraway in which, while acknowledging the force of Haraway&#039;s argument, she suggests that the cyborg&#039;s focus on bodily augmentation and modification doesn&#039;t go quite far enough for the more subtle algorithmic workings of contemporary digital culture, 20 years on. The paper is well worth a read - you can find it here:
http://www.sagepub.com/rose/Docs/Hayles.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, I also found this a really well-done summary of the manifesto, and Katherine&#8217;s examples from the film festival give it extra force. One of the readings we have looked at in previous years, though not this one so far, is Katherine Hayles&#8217; response to Haraway in which, while acknowledging the force of Haraway&#8217;s argument, she suggests that the cyborg&#8217;s focus on bodily augmentation and modification doesn&#8217;t go quite far enough for the more subtle algorithmic workings of contemporary digital culture, 20 years on. The paper is well worth a read &#8211; you can find it here:<br />
<a href="http://www.sagepub.com/rose/Docs/Hayles.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sagepub.com/rose/Docs/Hayles.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/2015/01/22/haraways-cyborg-manifesto/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katherine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/?p=100#comment-12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Nick! 
I really got excited about Haraway&#039;s Cyborg Manifesto in IDEL, and I think this is a great recap. I also like the way the Manifesto explores ways of being feminist that can be intersectional with other kinds of disadvantage (like race or class). 
In a later book, Modest_witnesss@second_millenium , Haraway uses this concept to reflect on the many people who make technological advances happen (all the lab assistants, cleaners, admin staff, grants officers, security, post-docs etc) who tend to get written out of the story of &#039;great discoveries&#039;--it&#039;s a lot of white men getting Nobel Prizes, on the labour of a lot of invisible people. 
This can be really useful to help us, say, watch the films in the first festival. How come it&#039;s a white guy who gets to be the hero of the story (with a stereotypical white-haired man in a lab coat as the lead scientist), and not the Hispanic hacker or the woman who found a way to contact her boyfriend and rescue him? How come it was the white humanoid robot who got to drive the Cadillac down the Pacific Highway, while the brown-monster robot drove the mouse-engine? 
I would LOVE to read someone assessing the character of Rachael (the replicant in Blade Runner not shown in the clip in the festival) as a cyborg through Haraway&#039;s essay.  
That was four unconnected responses, but her essay is so useful because it generates so many questions of our own!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick!<br />
I really got excited about Haraway&#8217;s Cyborg Manifesto in IDEL, and I think this is a great recap. I also like the way the Manifesto explores ways of being feminist that can be intersectional with other kinds of disadvantage (like race or class).<br />
In a later book, Modest_witnesss@second_millenium , Haraway uses this concept to reflect on the many people who make technological advances happen (all the lab assistants, cleaners, admin staff, grants officers, security, post-docs etc) who tend to get written out of the story of &#8216;great discoveries&#8217;&#8211;it&#8217;s a lot of white men getting Nobel Prizes, on the labour of a lot of invisible people.<br />
This can be really useful to help us, say, watch the films in the first festival. How come it&#8217;s a white guy who gets to be the hero of the story (with a stereotypical white-haired man in a lab coat as the lead scientist), and not the Hispanic hacker or the woman who found a way to contact her boyfriend and rescue him? How come it was the white humanoid robot who got to drive the Cadillac down the Pacific Highway, while the brown-monster robot drove the mouse-engine?<br />
I would LOVE to read someone assessing the character of Rachael (the replicant in Blade Runner not shown in the clip in the festival) as a cyborg through Haraway&#8217;s essay.<br />
That was four unconnected responses, but her essay is so useful because it generates so many questions of our own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
