<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Summary and reflections from Ben Williamson&#8217;s presentation</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/2015/03/10/summary-of-ben-williamsons-presentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/2015/03/10/summary-of-ben-williamsons-presentation/</link>
	<description>&#34;If you could see what I have seen with your eyes ...&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:20:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Fameli</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/2015/03/10/summary-of-ben-williamsons-presentation/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ Fameli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/njenkins/?p=400#comment-160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick, as always, I appreciate your nice synthesis here. I am about half way through, and took a break to read your summary. It is thought-provoking presentation, but I&#039;m finding it tedious that Williamson is basically reading most of the text on every slide. While I am excited by the idea about the potential of &#039;sentient&#039; &#039;universities&#039;, I don&#039;t think the public and educational policies are keeping pace with the exponential advances in technologies. I am not sanguine about inserting &#039;out of control,&#039; buggy&#039; algorithms into the educational system which already has inherent issues and challenges, &#039;algorithmists&#039; &#039;engineering the public.&#039; I&#039;ll try to post a blog of comparable quality to yours above when I&#039;ve finished viewing. Cheers, PJ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, as always, I appreciate your nice synthesis here. I am about half way through, and took a break to read your summary. It is thought-provoking presentation, but I&#8217;m finding it tedious that Williamson is basically reading most of the text on every slide. While I am excited by the idea about the potential of &#8216;sentient&#8217; &#8216;universities&#8217;, I don&#8217;t think the public and educational policies are keeping pace with the exponential advances in technologies. I am not sanguine about inserting &#8216;out of control,&#8217; buggy&#8217; algorithms into the educational system which already has inherent issues and challenges, &#8216;algorithmists&#8217; &#8216;engineering the public.&#8217; I&#8217;ll try to post a blog of comparable quality to yours above when I&#8217;ve finished viewing. Cheers, PJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
