<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PJ&#039;s EDC blog &#187; assemblages; cyborgs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/pfameli/tag/assemblages-cyborgs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/pfameli</link>
	<description>Education and Digital Culture 2015 Course Lifestream Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Assemblages vs. Cyborgs</title>
		<link>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/pfameli/2015/01/23/assemblages-vs-cyborgs/</link>
		<comments>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/pfameli/2015/01/23/assemblages-vs-cyborgs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ Fameli]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assemblages; cyborgs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/pfameli/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What appeals to me about this &#8220;Technology in Education: A Future Classroom&#8221; video is that the socio-materiality of the classroom is more of utopian, yet feasible assemblages than the dystopian, cyborg perspectives that we have been sharing in this course so far. I think it is interesting that the primary technology is glass (silicon-based) vs. [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="474" height="267" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uZ73ZsBkcus?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>What appeals to me about this &#8220;Technology in Education: A Future Classroom&#8221; video is that the socio-materiality of the classroom is more of utopian, yet feasible assemblages than the dystopian, cyborg perspectives that we have been sharing in this course so far.<br />
I think it is interesting that the primary technology is glass (silicon-based) vs. the cyborg materials of metal, tubes, pipes and wires. I also appreciate the harmonious &#8216;coupling&#8217; of the human (e.g. students; foregrounded teachers) and technology. The learning environment is fluid, dynamic, organic, tactile, creative and collaborative.</p>
<p><a href="http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/pfameli/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2015/01/children-growth-digital_technology-development-advance-expectation-gri0144_low.jpg"><img src="http://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/pfameli/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2015/01/children-growth-digital_technology-development-advance-expectation-gri0144_low-246x300.jpg" alt="&quot;At what age can we expect him to understand digital technology?&quot;" width="246" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1233" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://edc15.education.ed.ac.uk/pfameli/2015/01/23/assemblages-vs-cyborgs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
